Preparation Info for Tactical Audit ref:040
-
You will be assigned one of the following Assessments. The questions must be completed PRIOR to your Tactical Audit Consultation with JJ.
-
version 1.0 – can be ran on any browser (just open the html file (full html below)
Armstrong Metabolic Reversal Assessment | Practitioner Tool 🔬 Armstrong Metabolic Reversal Assessment
Practitioner-Administered Tool | 45-Minute Consultation | Version 1.0© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | Proprietary & Confidential1. Demographics2. Anthropometrics3. T2D Diagnosis4. Medications5. Complications6. Lifestyle7. Psychology8. Knowledge9. Logistics10. Financial11. Movement12. Family HistorySection 1: Demographics & Baseline
📊 Age Reference: Under 50 = favorable | 50-65 = typical | Over 65 = requires modified approachSection 2: Body Composition
📊 BMI Reference: 18.5-24.9 = Normal | 25-29.9 = Overweight | 30+ = Obesity | >40 = Severe Obesity⚠️ Risk Thresholds: Male >102 cm (40 in) | Female >88 cm (35 in) = High visceral fatSection 3: T2D History
⏱️ 10-Year Window: <5 years = optimal reversal | 5-10 years = possible | >10 years = challenging📈 A1c Scale: <6.5% = Excellent | 6.5-7.4% = Good | 7.5-8.4% = Moderate | 8.5-9.4% = High Risk | >9.5% = CriticalTarget: 80-130 mg/dL | >160 = poor controlSection 4: Medication Profile
💊 Insulin = Major Barrier | Sulfonylureas = Hypoglycemia Risk | GLP-1/SGLT2 = SupportiveSection 5: Complications & Comorbidities
🚩 Red Flags: eGFR <45, active retinopathy, heart failure = physician clearance mandatorySection 6: Lifestyle & Behaviors
📊 Ideal Targets: Exercise 4+ days/wk | Sleep 7-8 hrs | Stress <5/10Section 7: Psychology & Readiness
🎯 Key Predictor: Previous weight loss improving glucose = strongest success indicatorSection 8: Diabetes Knowledge
Section 9: Practical Logistics
Section 10: Financial Commitment
Section 11: Physical Capability
Section 12: Family History
📋 Assessment Results
-
Accordion content
Armstrong Metabolic Reversal Assessment | v2.0 Enhanced 🔬 Armstrong Metabolic Reversal Assessment
Adaptive Clinical Tool | Enhanced v2.0 | PDF/CSV/Email© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | Proprietary & Confidential🎨 Theme:Section 1 of 10 Score: — Complete: 0%⚠️ Please complete all required fields before submittingSection 1: Demographics & Baseline
Basic information to establish client identity and context.📊 Age Reference: Under 50 = favorable | 50-65 = typical | Over 65 = modified approachSection 2: Body Composition
⚠️ Risk: Male >102cm | Female >88cm = high visceral fatSection 3: T2D History & Severity
⏱️ <5 years = optimal reversal | 5-10 years = possible | >10 years = challenging📈 <6.5% Excellent | 6.5-7.4% Good | 7.5-8.4% Moderate | 8.5-9.4% High Risk | >9.5% Critical⚠️ Hypoglycemia risk during intervention – physician coordination requiredSection 4: Complications & Comorbidities
🚩 Physician clearance mandatory before exercise program🚩 eGFR <45 = physician clearance requiredSection 5: Lifestyle & Behaviors
Section 6: Psychology & Reversal Readiness
Section 7: Family & Social Support
Section 8: Practical Logistics
Section 9: Financial Commitment
Section 10: Physical Capability
📋 Assessment Results
-
v.3
Armstrong Metabolic Reversal | Adaptive Clinical Assessment v3.0 🔬 Armstrong Metabolic Reversal
Adaptive assessment · conditional logic · clinical decision support© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | v3.0Section 1 of 10Score: —1. Demographics & baseline
📊 Age reference: under 50 favorable2. Body composition
⚠️ Male >102cm / female >88cm = high visceral fat3. T2D history & medications
<6.5% excellent | 6.5-7.4% good | 7.5-8.4% moderate | >9.5% critical⚠️ Hypoglycemia risk – coordinate with physician4. Complications & comorbidities
🚩 Physician clearance mandatory before exercise5. Lifestyle & behaviors
6. Psychology & readiness
7. Family & social support
8. Practical logistics
9. Financial commitment
10. Physical capability
-
Accordion content
Armstrong Metabolic Institute | Clinical Reference Charts Library 📊 Armstrong Metabolic Reference Charts
Clinical decision support | Evidence-based thresholds | v1.0
© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | Proprietary & Confidential📑 Table of Contents
1. A1c Clinical Classification 2. Fasting Glucose Reference 3. Time in Range (CGM) Standards 4. Years Since Diagnosis – Reversal Window 5. BMI Classification 6. Waist Circumference Risk Thresholds 7. Body Fat Percentage Norms 8. Waist-to-Hip Ratio Standards 9. Medication Reversal Compatibility 10. Insulin Dose – Difficulty Scale 11. Blood Pressure Classification 12. Lipid Profile Targets 13. eGFR Kidney Function Stages 14. Neuropathy Severity Scale 15. Exercise Prescription Zones 16. Sleep Duration & Metabolic Health 17. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) 18. Depression Screening (PHQ-2) 19. Commitment to Change Scale 20. Self-Efficacy for Diabetes 21. Epworth Sleepiness Scale 22. STOP-Bang Sleep Apnea Screen 23. Physical Activity Readiness 24. Functional Movement Screener 25. Family History Risk Loading 26. Social Support Scale 27. Health Literacy Assessment 28. Financial Readiness Index 29. Program Suitability Composite Score 30. Reversal Probability EstimatorChart 1: A1c Clinical Classification
↑ Back to TOCA1c (%) Classification Reversal Potential <5.7 Normal N/A 5.7 – 6.4 Prediabetes Excellent 6.5 – 7.0 Diabetes – Controlled Very High 7.1 – 7.5 Diabetes – Moderate High 7.6 – 8.5 Diabetes – Poor Control Moderate 8.6 – 9.5 Diabetes – Very Poor Low >9.5 Diabetes – Critical Very Low 📖 Source: American Diabetes Association. “Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025.” Diabetes Care 2025;48(Suppl. 1):S27-S49. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-S002Chart 2: Fasting Glucose Reference
↑ Back to TOCmg/dL mmol/L Classification 70-99 3.9-5.5 Normal 100-125 5.6-6.9 Impaired Fasting Glucose 126-160 7.0-8.9 Diabetes – Fair Control 161-200 9.0-11.1 Diabetes – Poor Control >200 >11.1 Diabetes – Critical 📖 Source: World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria. WHO ReferenceChart 3: Time in Range (CGM) Standards
↑ Back to TOCTime in Range 70-180 mg/dL Classification >85% Excellent 70-85% Good 50-70% Fair <50% Poor 📖 Source: Battelino T, et al. ATTD consensus. Diabetology International 2025. LinkChart 4: Years Since Diagnosis – Reversal Window
↑ Back to TOCYears Reversal Probability Beta Cell Function <2 85-95% Near normal 2-5 70-85% Mild reduction 5-7 50-70% Moderate reduction 7-10 30-50% Significant reduction 10-15 15-30% Severe reduction >15 <15% Minimal remaining 📖 Source: DiRECT trial (Taylor et al., Lancet 2018) & 5-year extension. Diabetes UKChart 5: BMI Classification
↑ Back to TOCBMI Range Classification <18.5 Underweight 18.5-24.9 Normal 25-29.9 Overweight 30-34.9 Obesity Class I 35-39.9 Obesity Class II ≥40 Obesity Class III 📖 Source: World Health Organization (WHO) BMI classification. WHO BMIChart 6: Waist Circumference Risk Thresholds
↑ Back to TOCGender Low Risk High Risk Male <94 cm (<37 in) ≥102 cm (≥40 in) Female <80 cm (<31.5 in) ≥88 cm (≥35 in) 📖 Source: IDF/WHO/NIH. PMC 7231748Chart 7: Body Fat Percentage Norms
↑ Back to TOCCategory Male Female Essential Fat 2-5% 10-13% Athletes 6-13% 14-20% Fitness 14-17% 21-24% Average 18-24% 25-31% Obese >25% >32% 📖 Source: ACSM/ACE via InBody USA (clinical consensus)Chart 8: Waist-to-Hip Ratio Standards
↑ Back to TOCRisk Male Female Low Risk <0.85 <0.75 Moderate 0.85-0.95 0.75-0.85 High 0.96-1.00 0.86-0.90 Very High >1.00 >0.90 📖 Source: World Health Organization (WHO) expandedChart 9: Medication Reversal Compatibility
↑ Back to TOCMedication Compatibility Metformin ✓ Fully compatible SGLT2 / GLP-1 ✓ Compatible Sulfonylureas ⚠️ High caution (hypoglycemia) Insulin <20u ⚠️ Caution Insulin >50u ⚠️ Major barrier 📖 Based on ADA/EASD consensus & Armstrong Protocol clinical experienceChart 10: Insulin Dose – Difficulty Scale
↑ Back to TOCUnits/day Difficulty 0 Low 1-10 Low-Moderate 11-20 Moderate 21-35 High 36-50 Very High >50 Severe 📖 Armstrong Protocol clinical algorithmChart 11: Blood Pressure Classification
↑ Back to TOCCategory Systolic Diastolic Normal <120 <80 Elevated 120-129 <80 Stage 1 HTN 130-139 80-89 Stage 2 HTN ≥140 ≥90 📖 Source: ACC/AHA 2025 Guidelines. LinkChart 12: Lipid Profile Targets
↑ Back to TOCLipid Optimal (mg/dL) LDL <100 HDL (M) >40 HDL (F) >50 Triglycerides <150 📖 ADA/EASD consensusChart 13: eGFR Kidney Function Stages
↑ Back to TOCeGFR Stage >90 Normal 60-89 Mild 45-59 Mild-Mod 30-44 Moderate 15-29 Severe <15 Kidney Failure 📖 KDIGO 2024 CKD GuidelineChart 14: Neuropathy Severity Scale
↑ Back to TOCSeverity Symptoms None (0) No symptoms Mild (1-3) Occasional tingling Moderate (4-6) Regular numbness, mild pain Severe (7-10) Constant pain, loss of sensation 📖 Clinical consensus – Armstrong ProtocolChart 15: Exercise Prescription Zones
↑ Back to TOCZone %HRmax T2D Benefit Fat Oxidation 60-70% Insulin sensitivity +++ HIIT >88% Glucose disposal ++++ 📖 ACSM guidelines + Armstrong ProtocolChart 16: Sleep Duration & Metabolic Health
↑ Back to TOCSleep Impact <5 hrs Severe negative (↓ insulin sensitivity 30-40%) 5-6 hrs Moderate negative 7-8 hrs Optimal 📖 Cappuccio et al. (2010) & clinical consensusChart 17: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4)
↑ Back to TOCScore Stress Level 0-4 Low 5-7 Moderate 8-12 High 📖 Cohen S. (1983) – Perceived Stress ScaleChart 18: Depression Screening (PHQ-2)
↑ Back to TOCScore Action 0-1 Normal 2-3 Monitor 4-6 Refer for support 📖 Kroenke K (2003) – PHQ-2Chart 19: Commitment to Change Scale
↑ Back to TOCScore Recommendation 1-3 Do NOT enroll 4-6 Motivational interviewing needed 7-8 Acceptable with support 9-10 Ideal candidate 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietary scaleChart 20: Self-Efficacy for Diabetes
↑ Back to TOCScore (5-50) Level 40-50 High – excellent candidate 25-39 Moderate – needs accountability <25 Low – preparatory phase required 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietaryChart 21: Epworth Sleepiness Scale
↑ Back to TOCScore Meaning 0-7 Normal 8-9 Average 10-12 Sleepy 13-16 Very sleepy 17-24 Dangerous – refer for sleep study 📖 Johns MW (1991) – Epworth Sleepiness ScaleChart 22: STOP-Bang Sleep Apnea Screen
↑ Back to TOCScore Risk 0-2 Low 3-4 Intermediate – consider sleep study 5-8 High – sleep study recommended 📖 Chung F (2008) – STOP-Bang questionnaireChart 23: Physical Activity Readiness
↑ Back to TOCDays/week Reversal Impact 0 Severe negative 1-2 Moderate negative 3-4 Positive 5-6 Strongly positive 7 Excellent 📖 ACSM / Armstrong Protocol consensusChart 24: Functional Movement Screener
↑ Back to TOCPasses Program 5/5 Full exercise prescription 3-4 Modified program 1-2 Supervised only 0 PT referral recommended 📖 Cook G (2006) – Functional Movement ScreenChart 25: Family History Risk Loading
↑ Back to TOCFamily History Genetic Loading No relatives Low 1 parent, age >60 Low-Moderate 1 parent, age <50 Moderate 2 parents High ;Parent + sibling Very High 📖 Clinical consensus – DiRECT predictorsChart 26: Social Support Scale
↑ Back to TOCScore (5-50) Prognosis 40-50 Strong – excellent prognosis 25-39 Adequate <25 Insufficient – program support needed 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietaryChart 27: Health Literacy Assessment
↑ Back to TOCScore (5-15) Literacy Level 12-15 High – use technical language 8-11 Moderate – plain language 5-7 Low – extensive education <5 Very low – refer to basic education 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietary scaleChart 28: Financial Readiness Index
↑ Back to TOCScore (5-15) Alignment 13-15 Strong – full alignment 9-12 Moderate – may need payment plan 5-8 Poor – not suitable for premium program 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietaryChart 29: Program Suitability Composite Score
↑ Back to TOCScore (6-24) Category 21-24 IDEAL – fast-track enrollment 17-20 GOOD – proceed with confidence 13-16 BORDERLINE – extended prep phase <13 NOT SUITABLE – redirect 📖 Armstrong Protocol proprietary compositeChart 30: Reversal Probability Estimator
↑ Back to TOCPositive Factors (of 6) Probability 6/6 90-95% 5/6 75-85% 4/6 60-70% 3/6 40-55% 2/6 25-35% 1/6 10-20% 0/6 <5% 📖 Based on DiRECT trial predictors (Taylor et al., 2018)© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | Armstrong Metabolic Institute | All Rights Reserved
These reference charts are proprietary clinical tools. Not for distribution without license.
🔬 Armstrong Metabolic Assessment
Clinical T2D Reversal Candidate Evaluation
© J.J. Armstrong, M.Sc. | Proprietary
🎨 Theme:Section 1 of 10 Score: -- Complete: 0%⚠️ Please complete all required fieldsSection 1: Demographics
Section 2: Body Composition
Section 3: T2D History
Section 4: Complications
🚩 Physician clearance requiredSection 5: Lifestyle
Section 6: Psychology
Section 7: Support
Section 8: Logistics
Section 9: Financial
Section 10: Physical Capability
📋 Assessment Results
📧 Send PDF Report to Email(s) (Optional)
⚠️ Option A: Download PDF first, then click Email Reports - your email client will open with instructions to attach the PDF.